Hi, > 2. The silent skip in get_all_vacuum_rels produces a different user-visible > behavior than vacuum_open_relation's WARNING for > what's essentially the same race (concurrent drop during a database-wide > VACUUM). > I think the silent path is fine here, as the user didn't explicitly ask for > that table.
I personally think it's worth a WARNING because the relation is exist when we scan pg_class. I'm also OK if most people think the WARNING is useless. -- Regards, ChangAo Chen
