Hello Bryan, On 2026-Aug-10, Bryan Green wrote:
> On 8/8/26 22:44, Bryan Green wrote: > > > In recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level.pl, standby3, standby4, and standby5 > > are all init_from_backup()'d from 'my_backup', taken near the top of the > > test, and started much later, after the primary has produced and recycled a > > lot of WAL. Nothing keeps the WAL they need to reach consistency: no slot > > covering it, no wal_keep_size, no archive. > > I have a use case that is not stock PG that this is related to. I'm > withdrawing this. You have a use case for ... this test remaining borderline broken? I'm wondering if you wanted to reply to some other thread. Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La vida es para el que se aventura"
