On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 01:58:19PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > I think 0002 and 0003 are purely mechanical; they look good to me and > > can go in first. > > Thanks. 0002 and 0003 are kind of independent on the rest, not > requiring any Oid8 idea, so I'll go apply them.
0002 has been applied as of 2b3d11aaed89. 0003 does a bunch of renames and in order to raise a bit more awareness and not get screamed at after-the-fact, I have posted that on a different thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] The first feedbacks I had we OK, so I don't expect any pushback, just being careful and we still have time. After an extra set of checks, I am dropping the catcache thing for OID8OID, for the simple reason that there is no need for it anymore. I am pretty sure that I did some OID8 catalog lookup at some point of this patch set, but nothing shows up now. Perhaps that was in the round 1 of the discussion. I'll post a rebase of the remaining pieces once the rename thread is completely settled, hopefully around the beginning of next week. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
