Hi, On Tue, 29 Sept 2026 at 07:30, Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Attached is v2 with those changes. Thoughts? > > > > Hi Ayush. > > ////////// > Patch v2-0001 > ////////// > > Patch 0001 looks good to me, but more eyes than mine need to review it.
Thanks for the review! > > ////////// > Patch v2-0002 > ////////// > > I confirmed the test fails when patch 0001 is not applied and passes > when it is applied. > > I assume the test code is AI-generated, because it looks way less > human-readable than a typical TAP test. If the test is ever intended > to be pushed, then it needs lots of comments to describe what it is > doing and expecting at each step. I do not intend this to be pushed since as I stated upthread its a niche case that came out of manual review rather than field report. I'll post a simplified version in some time for the same, thanks for looking into it. Regards, Ayush
