On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 4:55 PM Paul A Jungwirth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2026, Nisha Moond <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 1) The change to RelationFindDeletedTupleInfoByIndex() doesn't seem to > > be covered by a test. Maybe we could add a case to 035_conflicts.pl? > > This was tricky, but I figured out a way to do it. My test adds a row > on the publisher before creating the subscription, then uses > copy_data=false. Then I add & delete a "decoy" row with a different > multirange but the same lossy bounding range. When the publisher > updates the first row, it gets update_deleted before the fix and > update_missing after. >
I think this test is timing dependent because if Delete happens before Update, the conflict slot could be updated and the row could be removed. If it is too tricky/tough to write this test, we can even skip it. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
