On 2018/11/09 4:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Pushed. Thank you for committing. I've closed the CF entry.
> I included the test case for collations to the three branches, but no > code changes. We can patch master for the handling of collations per > your patch, Okay, but should we back-patch it by adding WARNING to back-branches as you suggest? > and if somebody has it, a change to how defaults are applied > when routing tuples. I haven't written such a patch yet. Do we want such a feature? Thanks, Amit
