On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:02:31PM +0900, myungkyu.lim wrote: >> I got confused by the field name. If we have 'last_msg_send_time' >> field in pg_stat_replciation which has information of wal senders >> users would think it as a time when the wal sender sent a message last >> time. However values of the fields actually shows a time when the wal >> receiver sent a reply message last time. So perhaps >> 'last_reply_send_time' would be more clear. > > Good point. 'last_reply_send_time' is better. > How about just 'reply_time'?
Please note that the original thread has mentioned reply_timestamp as a consensus: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZ39FvwbVQGAusNx_Mv%3DyqOr_UFuFnMorNYNvxPaxkOeA%40mail.gmail.com -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
