On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > The partition_bounds_copy() is not because of your changes, it's there in > HEAD.
OK, but it seems to me that your version of my patch rearranges the code more than necessary. How about the attached? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
v3-0001-Reduce-unnecessary-list-construction-in-RelationB.patch
Description: Binary data
