Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > Could we have another output type called "separated" that uses the existing > --fieldsep / --recordsep?
Uh, what's the difference from the existing unaligned format? regards, tom lane
Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > Could we have another output type called "separated" that uses the existing > --fieldsep / --recordsep?
Uh, what's the difference from the existing unaligned format? regards, tom lane