On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:21 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > About the status of the patch, to me it should be RWF. It's been > > moved to the next CF several times with no progress besides rebases. > > Let me disagree. Judging from the commentaries in this discussion it could be > significant and useful feature, and the author is trying to keep this patch > uptodate. The lack of reviews could be due other reasons than desirability of > the patch (as well as as for many other interesting proposals in hackers).
+1. I, for one, care about this feature. We're all very busy, but I don't want to see it die. -- Peter Geoghegan
