Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Feb-06, Arseny Sher wrote: > >> >> Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> >> > note the additional pg_temp_XYZ row in the middle. This is caused by >> > the rewrite in ALTER TABLE. Peter E fixed that in Pg11 in commit >> > 325f2ec55; I don't think there's much to do in the backbranches other >> > than hide the pesky record to avoid it breaking the test. >> >> Oh, I see. Let's just remove the first insertion then, as in attached. >> I've tested it on master and on 9.4. > > Ah, okay. Does the test still fail when run without the code fix? Yes. The problem here is overriding cmax of catalog (pg_attribute in the test) tuples, so it fails without any data at all. -- Arseny Sher Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
