Hi,
Am Montag, den 18.02.2019, 12:24 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 09:00:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Well, pg_rewind is also using kB, so should I switch it back to that?
>
> I am not sure which one is better, sorry :)
>
> There is an argument for switching pg_rewind to use MB as well. I
> don't expect pg_rewind to transfer gigs of data, but it could make the
> maths harder for a newcomer if it transfers a lot of data.
Right, I think it makes more sense for pg_basebackup and
pg_verify_checksums as they go over the whole cluster than for
pg_rewind, but being consistent is also worth something.
> > It looks like the progress reporting is otherwise quite similar, so what
> > exactly did you have in mind?
>
> I was thinking about a routine in src/common/ or such at this time.
> The tools have separate goals though, so it looks sensible as well to
> keep two routines. I am fine to let that up to you.
I'll leave it as-is for now, but will see whether this can be improved
in a follow-up patch.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael.ba...@credativ.de
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt
folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
