Am Montag, den 18.02.2019, 16:52 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck:
> > Surely we know at that point whether this first scan is needed, and
> we
> > can skip it if not?
> 
> Yeah - new patch attached.

Maybe i'm wrong, but my thought is that this breaks the SIGUSR1
business, since there seems no code path which calculates total_size in
this case?


        Bernd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to