On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 12:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > My own thought about how to improve this situation was just to destroy > and recreate LockMethodLocalHash at transaction end (or start) > if its size exceeded $some-value. Leaving it permanently bloated seems > like possibly a bad idea, even if we get rid of all the hash_seq_searches > on it.
That seems like a good idea. Although, it would be good to know that it didn't add too much overhead dropping and recreating the table when every transaction happened to obtain more locks than $some-value. If it did, then maybe we could track the average locks per of recent transactions and just ditch the table after the locks are released if the locks held by the last transaction exceeded the average * 1.something. No need to go near shared memory to do that. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
