Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:50:16PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But, having said that, we've learned that it's generally bad for
>> catalog-query functions to fail outright just because they're pointed
>> at the wrong kind of catalog object. So I think that what we want here
>> is for pg_partition_tree to return NULL or an empty set or some such
>> for a plain table, while its output for a childless partitioned table
>> should be visibly different from that. I'm not wedded to details
>> beyond that idea.
> Yep, that's the intention since cc53123. I won't come back to return
> an ERROR in any case. Here is what the patch gives for childless
> partitions FWIW:
> =# CREATE TABLE ptif_test (a int, b int) PARTITION BY range (a);
> CREATE TABLE
> =# SELECT * FROM pg_partition_tree('ptif_test');
> relid | parentrelid | isleaf | level
> -----------+-------------+--------+-------
> ptif_test | null | f | 0
> (1 row)
Right, while you'd get zero rows out for a non-partitioned table.
WFM.
regards, tom lane
