On 2019/03/02 18:21, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 11:38:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Right, while you'd get zero rows out for a non-partitioned table. >> WFM. > > Exactly. I have committed a patch doing exactly that, and I have > added test cases with a partitioned table and a partitioned index > which have no partitions.
Thanks for committing and adding me as an author. Regards, Amit
