From: mikalaike...@ibagroup.eu [mailto:mikalaike...@ibagroup.eu] > Based on your comment it seems to me that 'socket_timeout' should be > connected with statement_timeout. I mean that end-user should wait > statement_timeout + 'socket_timeout' for returning control. It looks much > more safer for me.
I'm afraid we cannot enforce that relationship programmatically, so I think the documentation should warn that socket_timeout be longer than statement_timeout. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
