On 2019-04-06 05:03, Tom Lane wrote: > Trying a standard pgbench test case (pgbench -M prepared -S with > one client and an -s 10 database), it seems that the patch is about > 0.5% slower than HEAD. Again, that's below the noise threshold, > but it's not promising for the net effects of this patch on workloads > that aren't specifically about large and prunable partition sets.
In my testing, I've also noticed that it seems to be slightly on the slower side for these simple tests. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
