On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:01 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2019年4月8日(月) 14:22 Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com>: >> >> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com] >> > "vacuum_truncate" gets my vote too. >> >> +1 > > > +1 > ISTM that we have small consensus to > use "vacuum_truncate".
I'm also fine with this name, and I also saw reports that this option is already needed in some production workload, as Andres explained.
