On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:30 PM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:15 PM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:58 PM Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:01 AM Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2019年4月8日(月) 14:22 Tsunakawa, Takayuki <[email protected]>: > > > >> > > > >> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[email protected]] > > > >> > "vacuum_truncate" gets my vote too. > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > ISTM that we have small consensus to > > > > use "vacuum_truncate". > > > > > > I'm also fine with this name, and I also saw reports that this option > > > is already needed in some production workload, as Andres explained. > > > > OK, so I pushed the "vacuum_truncate" version of the patch. > > Thank you! > > "TRUNCATE" option for vacuum command should be added to the open items?
Yes, I think. Attached is the patch which adds TRUNCATE option into VACUUM. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
vacuum_truncate_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
