> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:25 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I assume you're aware, but it's probably not going to be applied for 12...
Sure, the patch was mostly to express more clearly what I was thinking about :) > I think most of the read-only stuff just needs to be non-optional, and most > of the DML stuff needs to be optional. > On the executor side it'd probably be good to make the sample scan optional > too, but then we also need to check for that during parse-analysis. In > contast to bitmap scans there's no alternative way to execute them. Yeah, makes sense. > bulk insert already is optional... Oh, haven't noticed.
