On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > There's more to that than you might realize. For example, guc.c > enforces a limit on work_mem that's designed to ensure that > expressions like "work_mem * 1024L" won't overflow, and there are > similar choices elsewhere.
I was aware of that, but I wasn't aware of how many places that bleeds into until I checked just now. It would be nice if we could figure out how to make it obvious that the idioms around the use of long for work_mem stuff are idioms that have a specific rationale. It's pretty confusing as things stand. -- Peter Geoghegan
