On 2019-Jun-13, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Jun-13, Oleksii Kliukin wrote: > > > Makes sense. For the symmetry I have included those that perform lock > > upgrades in one session and those that doesn’t, while the other sessions > > acquire locks, do updates or deletes. For those that don’t upgrade locks the > > test checks that the locks are acquired in the correct order. > > Thanks for the updated patch! I'm about to push to branches 9.6-master. > It applies semi-cleanly (only pgindent-maturity whitespace conflicts).
Done, thanks for the report and patch! I tried hard to find a scenario that this patch breaks, but couldn't find anything. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services