Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> So please let me know if I seem to correctly understand the limits
> on its use.
> I gather that various extensions use it to stash various things. But
> (I assume) ... they will only touch fn_extra in FmgrInfo structs that
> pertain to *their own functions*. (Please say that's true?)
> IOW, it is assured that, if I am a language handler, when I am called
> to handle a function in my language, fn_extra is mine to use as I please ...
Yup.
> ... with the one big exception, if I am handling a function in my language
> that returns a set, and I will use SFRM_ValuePerCall mode, I have to leave
> fn_extra NULL before SRF_FIRSTCALL_INIT(), which plants its own gunk there,
> and then I can stash my stuff in gunk->user_fctx for the duration of that
> SRF call.
Yup. (Of course, you don't have to use the SRF_FIRSTCALL_INIT
infrastructure.)
Keep in mind that in most contexts, whatever you cache in fn_extra
will only be there for the life of the current query.
regards, tom lane
