On 06/15/19 21:21, Tom Lane wrote: > Yup. (Of course, you don't have to use the SRF_FIRSTCALL_INIT > infrastructure.)
That had crossed my mind ... but it seems there's around 80 or 100 lines of good stuff there that'd be a shame to duplicate. If only init_MultiFuncCall() took an extra void ** argument, and the stock SRF_FIRSTCALL_INIT passed &(fcinfo->flinfo->fn_extra), seems like most of it would be reusable. shutdown_MultiFuncCall would need to work slightly differently, and a caller who wanted to be different would need a customized variant of SRF_PERCALL_SETUP, but that's two lines. Cheers, -Chap
