On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:27:26PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Yeah but the new code already rejects those anyway. Note how > timestamptz_in() has explicit switch cases to accept those, and we > didn't carry those over into check_recovery_time().
Ditto. I was not paying much attention to the code. Your patch indeed rejects anything else than DTK_DATE. So we are good here, sorry for the noise. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature