On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:27:26PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Yeah but the new code already rejects those anyway.  Note how
> timestamptz_in() has explicit switch cases to accept those, and we
> didn't carry those over into check_recovery_time().

Ditto.  I was not paying much attention to the code.  Your patch
indeed rejects anything else than DTK_DATE.  So we are good here,
sorry for the noise.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to