On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:12:46PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > Are you talking about the replication connection from pg_receivewal > to the PostgreSQL server? That wouldn't do anything, because it is > the setting of "synchronous_commit" for an independent client > connection that is the problem:
Ditto. My previous message was wrong and you are right. You are right that this had better be documented. I have no thought this ne through completely. > One alternative option I see is for pg_receivewal to confirm that > it has applied the changes as soon as it flushed them. > It would be cheating somewhat, but it would work around the problem > in a way that few people would find surprising. Yes, that's wrong as pg_receivewal applies nothing. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
