Hi, Maybe I'm forgetting some dependency management discussion that I was part of recently, but is the following behavior unintentional?
create table p (a int, b int, c int) partition by list (a); create table p1 partition of p for values in (1) partition by list (b); create table p11 partition of p1 for values in (1); create index on p (c); alter table p drop column c; ERROR: cannot drop index p11_c_idx because index p1_c_idx requires it HINT: You can drop index p1_c_idx instead. Dropping c should've automatically dropped the index p_c_idx and its children and grandchildren, so the above complaint seems redundant. Thanks, Amit
