On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:58 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2019-Aug-22, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > > > 22.08.2019 16:13, Paul Guo wrote: > > > Thanks. I updated the patch to v5. It passes install-check testing and > > > recovery testing. > > Hi, > > Thank you for working on this fix. > > The overall design of the latest version looks good to me. > > But during the review, I found a bug in the current implementation. > > New behavior must apply to crash-recovery only, now it applies to > > archiveRecovery too. > > Hello > > Paul, Kyotaro, are you working on updating this bugfix? FWIW the latest > patch submitted by Paul is still current and CFbot says it passes its > own test, but from Anastasia's email it still needs a bit of work. > > Also: it would be good to have this new bogus scenario described by > Anastasia covered by a new TAP test. Anastasia, can we enlist you to > write that? Maybe Kyotaro? > > Thanks Anastasia and Alvaro for comment and suggestion. Sorry I've been busy working on some non-PG stuffs recently. I've never worked on archive recovery, so I expect a bit more time after I'm free (hopefully several days later) to take a look. Of course Kyotaro, Anastasia or anyone feel free to address the concern before that.
