On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:52 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I agree, and can we move forward with this 0001? The idea here is to > change no code (as also suggested by Tom elsewhere), and it's the > largest patch in this series by a mile. I checked --color-moved=zebra > and I think the patch looks fine, and also it compiles fine. I ran > src/tools/pginclude/headerscheck on it and found no complaints. > > So here's a rebased version, where the DETOAST_H whitespace has been > removed. No other changes from your original. Will you please push > soon?
Done, thanks. Here's the rest again with the additional rename added to 0003 (formerly 0004). I think it's probably OK to go ahead with that stuff, too, but I'll wait a bit to see if anyone wants to raise more objections. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
v5-0003-Rename-some-toasting-functions-based-on-whether-t.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0002-Allow-TOAST-tables-to-be-implemented-using-table-.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0001-Create-an-API-for-inserting-and-deleting-rows-in-.patch
Description: Binary data