On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:03:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 11:18:37AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > >> Won't 'Lateral' clause be helpful here as the patch contains it in one > >> of its tests? > > > > Ah true, I forgot that. > > If we are redesigning the interface, here are two extra thoughts which > may be worth considering: > 1) If the function returns multiple columns, could it make sense to > separate infomask and infomask2? This would then give 3 columns: > - The raw flags for infomask. > - The three combined flags for infomask. > - The flags for infomask2. > 2) Could it make sense to have a separate function for infomask2? >
I don't see much use of separating information for infomask and infomask2. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
