On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:56:33PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I suppose it should something other than partition(ed), since partitions can > be > partitioned, too... > > Attaching a partition acquires a <literal>SHARE UPDATE > EXCLUSIVE</literal> > lock on the parent table, in addition to > <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> locks on the child table and the > <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition (if any).
In this context, "on the child table" sounds a bit confusing? Would it make more sense to say the "on the table to be attached" instead? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
