On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:07:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:56:33PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I suppose it should something other than partition(ed), since partitions > > can be > > partitioned, too... > > > > Attaching a partition acquires a <literal>SHARE UPDATE > > EXCLUSIVE</literal> > > lock on the parent table, in addition to > > <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> locks on the child table and the > > <literal>DEFAULT</literal> partition (if any). > > In this context, "on the child table" sounds a bit confusing? Would > it make more sense to say the "on the table to be attached" instead?
I guess you mean because it's not a child until after the ALTER. Yes, that makes sense. Thanks, Justin
