Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 07:24:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> This test is passing in the newer branches --- evidently due to >> the 9.5-era commit 1a629c1b1, which removed this TAP script's >> dependency on "rm -rf". So we should either back-patch that >> commit into 9.4 or undo whatever configuration change caused >> drongo to try to run more tests. I favor the former.
> I would prefer simply removing the dependency of rm -rf in the tests, > even if that's for a short time as 9.4 is EOL in two months. I'd vote for back-patching 1a629c1b1 as-is, or is that what you meant? > A back-patch applies without conflicts, and the tests are able to pass. > Would you prefer doing it yourself? I have not checked yet on > Windows, better to make sure that it does not fail. I don't have the ability to test it on Windows --- if you want to do that, feel free to do so and push. regards, tom lane