On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 8:34 PM Luis Carril <luis.car...@swarm64.com> wrote: > > > Hi Vignesh, > > yes you are right I could reproduce it also with 'file_fdw'. The issue is > that LOCK is not supported on foreign tables, so I guess that the safest > solution is to make the --include-foreign-data incompatible with --jobs, > because skipping the locking for foreign tables maybe can lead to a deadlock > anyway. Suggestions? >
Yes we can support --include-foreign-data without parallel option and later add support for parallel option as a different patch. Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
