Hi, On 2020-03-16 16:03:51 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote: > While working on object access hooks, I noticed several locations > where I would expect the hook to be invoked, but no actual invocation. > I think this just barely qualifies as a bug. It's debatable because > whether it is a bug depends on the user's expectations and whether not > invoking the hook in these cases is defensible. Does anybody have any > recollection of an intentional choice not to invoke in these > locations?
I am strongly against treating this as a bug, which'd likely imply backpatching. New hook invocations are a noticable behavioural change, and very plausibly will break currently working extensions. That's fine for a major version upgrade, but not for a minor one, unless there are very good reasons. Andres
