On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 19:32, Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 19:23, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 07:15:05PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote: >> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 16:47, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> > Third, the idea that individual interfaces, e.g. JDBC, should throw >> an >> > error in this case while the server just changes the COMMIT return >> tag >> > to ROLLBACK is confusing. People regularly test SQL commands in the >> > server before writing applications or while debugging, and a >> behavior >> > mismatch would cause confusion. >> > >> > >> > I'm not sure what you mean by this. The server would throw an error. >> >> I am saying it is not wise to have interfaces behaving differently than >> the server, for the reasons stated above. >> >> Agreed and this is why I think it is important for the server to be > defining the behaviour instead of each interface deciding how to handle > this situation. > > > So it appears this is currently languishing as unresolved and feature freeze is imminent. What has to be done to get a decision one way or another before feature freeze. I have provided a patch that could be reviewed and at least be considered in the commitfest. Perhaps someone can review the patch and I can do whatever it takes to get it presentable ? Dave Cramer www.postgres.rocks