On 4/13/20 7:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes: >> On 4/13/20 7:02 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >>> Perhaps a counterproposal: We eliminate the content in the leftmost >>> "function column, but leave that there to allow the function name / >>> signature to span the full 3 columns. Then the rest of the info goes >>> below. This will also compress the table height down a bit. >> An attempt at a "POC" of what I'm describing (attached image). > Hmm ... what is determining the width of the left-hand column? > It doesn't seem to have any content, since the function entries > are being spanned across the whole table. > > I think the main practical problem though is that it wouldn't > work nicely for operators, since the key "name" you'd be looking > for would not be at the left of the signature line. I suppose we > don't necessarily have to have the same layout for operators as > for functions, but it feels like it'd be jarringly inconsistent. > >
Maybe highlight the item by bolding or colour? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
