On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 06:58:33AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> > I don't particularly want to remove the field, but we ought to
> > change or remove the comment.
>
> I'm not concerned about the existence of the field as well. The comment just
> made me worried that I might be missing some fundamental concept. Thanks for
> your opinion.
I have developed the attached patch to address this.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
diff --git a/src/include/access/heapam_xlog.h b/src/include/access/heapam_xlog.h
index aa17f7df84..38683893c0 100644
--- a/src/include/access/heapam_xlog.h
+++ b/src/include/access/heapam_xlog.h
@@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ typedef struct xl_heap_truncate
* or updated tuple in WAL; we can save a few bytes by reconstructing the
* fields that are available elsewhere in the WAL record, or perhaps just
* plain needn't be reconstructed. These are the fields we must store.
- * NOTE: t_hoff could be recomputed, but we may as well store it because
- * it will come for free due to alignment considerations.
+ * FYI, t_hoff could potentially be recomputed.
*/
typedef struct xl_heap_header
{
