Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > If the comment tells that t_hoff can be computed (i.e. it's no necessary to > include it in the structure), I think the comment should tell why it's yet > included. Maybe something about "historical reasons"? Perhaps we can say that > the storage used to be free due to padding, and that it's no longer so, but > it's still "cheap", so it's not worth to teach the REDO functions to compute > the value.
I've received some more replies to your email as soon as I had replied. I don't insist on my proposal, just go ahead with your simpler changes. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
