On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:12 AM John Naylor <john.nay...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Well, for starters it'll say the obvious, but since we have a concrete > timeframe, maybe a <note> tag to make it more visible, like in the > attached, compressed to avoid confusing the cfbot.
Yeah, that looks like a good spot. I think we should also add something to the documentation of the factorial operator, mentioning that it will be going away. Perhaps we can advise people to write !!3 instead of 3! for forward-compatibility, or maybe we should instead suggest numeric_fac(3). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company