Hi, Takayuki-san:
+ if (batch_size <= 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
+ errmsg("%s requires a non-negative integer value",
It seems the message doesn't match the check w.r.t. the batch size of 0.
+ int numInserted = numSlots;
Since numInserted is filled by ExecForeignBatchInsert(), the initialization
can be done with 0.
Cheers
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:52 PM tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com <
tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Tomas-san,
>
> From: Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com>
> > Good thing you reminded me that this is about inserts, and in that
> > case no, ExecInitModifyTable() doesn't know all leaf partitions, it
> > only sees the root table whose batch_size doesn't really matter. So
> > it's really ExecInitRoutingInfo() that I would recommend to set
> > ri_BatchSize; right after this block:
> >
> > /*
> > * If the partition is a foreign table, let the FDW init itself for
> > * routing tuples to the partition.
> > */
> > if (partRelInfo->ri_FdwRoutine != NULL &&
> > partRelInfo->ri_FdwRoutine->BeginForeignInsert != NULL)
> > partRelInfo->ri_FdwRoutine->BeginForeignInsert(mtstate, partRelInfo);
> >
> > Note that ExecInitRoutingInfo() is called only once for a partition
> > when it is initialized after being inserted into for the first time.
> >
> > For a non-partitioned targets, I'd still say set ri_BatchSize in
> > ExecInitModifyTable().
>
> Attached is the patch that added call to GetModifyBatchSize() to the above
> two places. The regression test passes.
>
> (FWIW, frankly, I prefer the previous version because the code is a bit
> smaller... Maybe we should refactor the code someday to reduce similar
> processings in both the partitioned case and non-partitioned case.)
>
>
> Regards
> Takayuki Tsunakawa
>
>
