Hi, On 2021-02-06 12:27:30 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > Why is GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() not named > GlobalVisCheckRemovableFullXid() instead? ISTM that that name makes > much more sense, since it is what I'd expect for a function that is > the "Full XID equivalent" of GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid(). > > Note also that GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() is the only symbol name > matching "GlobalVisIsRemovable*".
Looks like a mistake on my part... Probably a rename regex that somehow went wrong - I went back and forth on those names way too many times. Want me to push the fix? Greetings, Andres Freund
