Looking at the V29 style tablesync slot names now they appear like this: WARNING: could not drop tablesync replication slot "pg_16397_sync_16389_6927117142022745645" That is in the order subid + relid + sysid
Now that I see it in a message it seems a bit strange with the sysid just tacked onto the end like that. I am wondering if reordering of parent to child might be more natural. e.g sysid + subid + relid gives a more intuitive name IMO. So in this example it would be "pg_sync_6927117142022745645_16397_16389" Thoughts? ---- Kind Regards, Peter Smith Fujitsu Australia
