Le lun. 1 mars 2021 à 08:36, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Benoit Lobréau wrote: > > Done here : https://commitfest.postgresql.org/32/3012/ > > Documenting that properly for the archive command, as already done for > restore_command, sounds good to me. I am not sure that there is much > point in doing a cross-reference to the archiving section for one > specific field of pg_stat_archiver. > I wanted to add a warning that using pg_stat_archiver to monitor the good health of the archiver comes with a caveat in the view documentation itself. But couldn't find a concise way to do it. So I added a link. If you think it's unnecessary, that's ok. > For the second paragraph, I would recommend to move that to a > different <para> to outline this special case, leading to the > attached. > Good.
