On 3/1/21 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
monitor the archiver state in such case. That's orthogonal to this
patch but maybe we can add a new "archiver_start" timestamptz column
in pg_stat_archiver, so monitoring tools can detect a problem if it's
too far away from pg_postmaster_start_time() for instance?
There may be other solutions as well. I have applied the doc patch
for now.
This was applied (except for a small part). Should we now consider this
committed?
If not, can we get a new patch for the remaining changes?
Regards,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
