> Ok. ISTM that the option should be triggered as soon as it is > available, but you do as you wish.
Can you elaborate why you think that using COPY FREEZE before 14 is beneficial? Or do you want to standardize to use COPY FREEZE? > I'm unsure how this could happen ever. The benefit of not caring is > less lines of codes in pgbench and a later call will catch the issue > anyway, if libpq is corrupted. I have looked in the code of PQprotocolVersion. The only case in which it returns 0 is there's no connection. Yes, you are right. Once the connection has been successfuly established, there's no chance it fails. So I agree with you. >>> Question: should there be a word about copy using the freeze option? >>> I'd say yes, in the section describing "g". >> >> Can you elaborate about "section describing "g"? I am not sure what >> you mean. > > The "g" item in the section describing initialization steps > (i.e. option -I). I'd suggest just to replace "COPY" with "COPY > FREEZE" in the sentence. Ok. The section is needed to be modified. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
