Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info> writes:
> On 3/20/21 12:39 AM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On the way pg_upgrade also mangles the pg_database.datdba
>> (all databases are owned by postgres after an upgrade; will submit a
>> separate patch for that as I consider that a bug by itself).
> Patch attached.
Hmm, doesn't this lose all *other* database-level properties?
I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its
--create switch ought to be trying to update the database's
ownership.
regards, tom lane
