Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info> writes: >> On 3/21/21 12:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its >>> --create switch ought to be trying to update the database's >>> ownership.
> Thanks for that. I like this patch a lot better.
Needs a little more work than that --- we should allow it to respond
to the --no-owner switch, for example. But I think likely we can do
it where other object ownership is handled. I'll look in a bit.
regards, tom lane
