On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:43 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:17 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this function, we already have the "defel" variable then I do not > > understand why you are using one extra variable and assigning defel to > > that? > > If the goal is to just improve the error message then you can simply > > use defel->defname? > > Yeah. I can do that. Thanks for the comment. > > While on this, I also removed the duplicate_error and procedure_error > goto statements, because IMHO, using goto statements is not an elegant > way. I used boolean flags to do the job instead. See the attached and > let me know what you think.
Okay, but I see one side effect of this, basically earlier on procedure_error and duplicate_error we were not assigning anything to output parameters, e.g. volatility_item, but now those values will be assigned with defel even if there is an error. So I think we should better avoid such change. But even if you want to do then better check for any impacts on the caller. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
